Germany’s control is preventive: the DFL licenses clubs season by season against economic criteria — liquidity proof, going-concern status, obligations current — and can impose conditions before problems become crises. It is licensing rather than a single public spending cap, so Zelador scores German clubs against indicative benchmarks, clearly labeled, while tracking the liquidity and obligation metrics the licensing process actually examines.
| Check | Limit | |
|---|---|---|
| Wage sustainability | ≤ 65% | |
| Squad cost vs revenue | ≤ 75% |
No-signup demo. Load the club’s figures and the panel runs these checks instantly.
Try the demo View pricingNo. The DFL licensing system checks liquidity, going concern and obligations each season — prevention through licensing rather than a cap.
Economic criteria checked season by season: proof of liquidity, going-concern status and obligations kept current — with the power to impose conditions on a club before a problem becomes a crisis.
It is preventive rather than numeric: instead of one public percentage, the DFL judges whether each club can meet its commitments for the season ahead. The discipline it demands — liquidity and current obligations — is the same one a cap tries to force.
Cash-flow projection, liquidity tracking and wage sustainability in one place — the license file’s substance, maintained year-round.